News - Sills & Betteridge Solicitors

Six Points in the Post: Don’t Ignore a Section 172 Notice

Why ignoring a Section 172 letter can cost you more than the speeding ticket itself, by Motoring Offences Expert Justin Atkinson

Family Lawyer Sarah Rowe Shortlisted for Partner of the Year in the 2025 Yorkshire Legal Awards

Awards season is off to a strong start this year, with Sarah Rowe being shortlisted for Partner of the Year in the 2025 Yorkshire Legal Awards.

Switch, Let or Sell a Second Home

For some, owning a second home is a dream, evoking thoughts of seaside cottages and impromptu getaways. The reality though can be rather different. Not only is there the issue of ongoing maintenance, but recent changes have made ownership more expensive, something which could account for the recent surge in sales of second homes.

What is Fraudulent Calumny and can it invalidate a Will?

Karen Bower-Brown
31 Jul 2025
Law Blog
Commercial Litigation & Dispute Resolution

Do you believe that a loved one who has passed away has been tricked into a leaving a Will to exclude you on the basis that their mind had been poisoned against you? Whilst there are several grounds upon which a Will can be contested, one lesser-known ground that may be relevant to you is fraudulent calumny.

AI at Work | What Employers Need to Know about the Legal Risks and Responsibilities

28 Jul 2025
Law Blog
Employment Law

Artificial Intelligence (AI) is rapidly transforming workplaces across the UK, thereby providing increased efficiency, enhanced decision making and automation of many routine tasks. There are now recruitment tools that can scan CVs to AI through Performance Management Systems, so there is a wide range of potential benefits for employers. However, with this advancement in AI technologies, there comes legal risks and responsibilities.

Labour's Day One Employment Rights | To Be Or Not To Be?

In a recent review of Labour's Employment Rights Bill, the House of Lords rejected a provision that would have granted protection to workers, against unfair dismissal from day one of their employment - something that formed one of the foundations of Labour's pledges within their manifesto. Instead, the House of Lords have backed an amendment to introduce a six-month qualifying period, replacing the government’s original proposal.